Luviena Lodh’s legal team releases fresh statement alleging Mahesh Bhatt, Mukesh Bhatt and Amyra Dastur ‘spreading rumour’

New Delhi: Actress Luviena Lodh courted controversy a number of days again after she levelled allegations towards filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, brother Mukesh Bhatt in relation with medication provide. She put up a video on social media saying that she is married to Sumit Sabharwal, who she claimed was Mahesh Bhatt’s nephew. She alleged that Sabharwal was within the enterprise of supplying medication and human trafficking. Lodh additionally alleged that Mahesh Bhatt operates this enterprise.

However, Mahesh Bhatt and Mukesh Bhatt denied all of the allegations, taking a authorized route. Later, Sumit Sabharwal too denied all such allegations and revealed that he’s not Bhatt’s nephew however solely works of their workplace. 

Now, Luviena Lodh’s legal professionals have launched a recent assertion claiming that PR crew of Bhatt brothers and actress Amyra Dastur are making false allegations towards their consumer. 

Here’s the assertion of Luviena’s authorized crew:

We confer with the people who find themselves concerned in spreading the hearsay and choosing a PAGE Three CONTENT by giving air to the false statements mentioned by my consumer, the folks concerned in sabotaging our purchasers repute and spreading the hearsay mill are THE PR – TEAM of the none apart from the next folks:

1. Mahesh Bhatt,
2. Mukesh Bhatt,
3. Amyra Dastur,
4. Kumkum Saigal &
5. Sahil Saigal

That with out mentioning the main points of the orders handed & making furore of adinterim orders handed which has totally a distinct interpretation.

That following the current incidents the video that was launched by our Client Ms. Luviena Lodh on 23rd October 2020 and the interviews there after, Mahesh Bhatt & Mukesh Bhatt filed & Amyra Dastur have filed separate fits in High Court of Bombay & Kumkum Saigal & Sahil Saigal in City Civil Court at Bombay for defamation in a hope that my consumer will likely be frightened and succumb to their bullying technique in entrance of the complete nation, ultimately which can end in backing off by our consumer. On the opposite, notice that our consumer being sturdy willed has stood her floor and maintained that she has spoken reality and nothing however the reality.

As far as hearings in defamation Suit of Mahesh Bhatt & Mukesh Bhatt on 26th October 2020 Before High Court of Bombay (Suit (L)/5102/2020) they tried to cease our consumer from holding press convention and getting a gag order towards our consumer the identical was orally refused/deferred additionally the argument for deleting the video was not thought-about and solely put up the assertion made by our Advocate that our consumer neither defamed nor are prepared to defame anybody orders have been handed which interprets we’d not defame them in future.

For the sake of brevity, the related paragraph is repeated There will likely be an ad-interim order by way of prayer clause (a) operative hereafter. For ease of reference prayer clause (a) reads as follows which reads as follows: – “(a). Pending the listening to and remaining disposal of the swimsuit, an order and injunction of this Hon’ble courtroom towards the respondent and/or her agent and/or servant and/or any individual claiming by and/or underneath the respondent from making, publishing, circulating and/or speaking to the general public any defamatory / slanderous feedback and/or statements towards the candidates, whether or not by means of the offending video at Exhibit-A to the plaint or by some other means in any respect.

“As far as hearings of defamation swimsuit of Amyra Dastur (Suit (L)/5102/2020) earlier than the Bombay High Court on 9 th November 2020 all of the factors have been put forth for deleting the video to stopping our consumer by means of additional communications however the courtroom allowed to file us reply and when our advocate made an announcement we’ve got neither in previous nor in future defamed anybody and we’re able to take narco – evaluation test an advert – interim was handed which if defined to layman speaks that in future there shouldn’t be any defamation so primarily no courts in any approach has barred our clientfrom talking the reality.

We additionally state that we’ve got talked about that our consumer has by no means spoken something apart from details and is able to bear Narco – Analysis test and lie detector test if Amyra Dastur is ushering the gospel reality then allow them to additionally take the test and all will likely be out on which the advocate refused to take the assessments and issues will be learn between the traces why the individual claiming the defamation refusing for Narco – Analysis test and Lie detector test.

For the sake of brevity, the related paragraph is repeated Having thought-about the respective submissions at bar, it will be simply and correct to grant ad-interim reduction to the plaintiff by way of prayer clause (c). For straightforward reference, prayer clause (c) is reproduced right here, which reads thus; “(c). That pending the hearing and disposal of the Suit, an order and injunction of this Hon’ble Court be passed against the Defendant and/or her agent and/or servant and/or any person claiming through and/or under the Defendant from publishing, circulating and/or communicating to the public and/or republishing any defamatory/slanderous comments and/or communicating to the public any defamatory, slanderous, libellous comments and/or statements against the Applicant/Plaintiff, whether by way of the offending and/ or defamatory statements against the applicant/Petitioner and/or the offending videos listed in the ‘Schedule at Exhibit B’ to the Plaint and/or by any other means and/or mediums whatsoever;”

Let the PR – Team claiming to have gotten ad-interim orders present that there’s an order that stops our consumer from making truthful assertion and each the orders solely point out don’t communicate or publish defamatory which is accessible even previous to submitting the swimsuit.

We are making this assertion to position on document that every one defences by Mr Mahesh Bhatt, Mukesh Bhatt, Kumkum Saigals, Sahil Saigal & Amyra Dastur are false, incorrect, baseless & one other try and intimidate and sabotage my consumer and her sturdy will. We are assured about case filed by them will likely be dismissed ultimately as being baseless and devoid of deserves and have full religion on the judiciary. We are assured that reality will prevail. Our consumer maintains the stand as talked about on the video of 23rd October 2020 and all of the details talked about to be true and nothing however the reality and if anybody is claiming that this violates the orders handed please file Contempt proceedings. We additionally point out that our consumer has confronted of lot of psychological trauma because of submitting of such frivolous criticism and we are going to take the suitable treatment as out there in regulation.