Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala addresses a press conference in New Delhi.

Babri Masjid demolition case: Verdict counter to SC judgment, says Congress

The Congress on Wednesday mentioned the particular Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court docket’s verdict on the Babri Masjid demolition case runs counter to the Supreme Court’s November 9 ruling and the Constitutional spirit. It urged the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh authorities to file an attraction and observe the letter of the legislation and the Constitution with none partiality and pre-meditated prejudice.

Addressing reporters on the occasion headquarters in Delhi, Congress’s chief spokesperson, Randeep Singh Surjewala mentioned the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court in its judgement on November 9 final yr held that demolition of the Babri Masjid was “clear illegality and egregious violation” of the rule of legislation.

Also learn: Court’s verdict proves no conspiracy was hatched in Ayodhya, says BJP’s Murli Manohar Joshi

“But the special court exonerated all the accused. It is clear that the decision of the special court runs counter to the decision of the Supreme Court,” he mentioned.

Surjewala mentioned the complete nation witnessed a “deep-rooted political conspiracy” by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) and its leaders to destroy the nation’s communal amity and brotherhood for usurping energy at any price.

“The then BJP government of Uttar Pradesh was a co-conspirator in the designed attack on India’s Constitutional ethos. So much so that Supreme Court was misled by filing a wrong affidavit on oath. It is only after detailed examination of all these aspects, facts and evidence that the Supreme Court held the demolition of Masjid to be an egregious violation of the rule of law,” he mentioned.

The Congress chief mentioned each Indian, who has innate religion within the Constitution as additionally within the spirit of communal amity and brotherhood, expects and urges the Centre and Uttar Pradesh authorities to file an attraction in opposition to the particular court docket’s resolution based in error and observe the letter of the legislation and the Constitution with none “partiality and pre-meditated prejudice”.

This is the true calling of the rule of legislation and the Constitution, he mentioned.